Skip Navigation Links
2014
2013
2012
2011
AGA Comments on EPA's Air Emissions Standards for the Natural Gas Sector (Nov. 30, 2011)
AGA Files Comments with SEAB on Shale Gas Development
AGA Files Comments on EPA's Subpart W Proposed Technical Revisions (Oct. 24, 2011)
AGA Comments Supporting NiSource’s 50-Year Habitat Conservation Plan (Oct. 11, 2011)
AGA Comments to NAS on How to Reform the Tax Code to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions & Apended NAS Report on Full Fuel Cycle Energy Efficiency (Sept. 20, 2011)
AGA Comments on EPA Proposed Corrections to Subpart W Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule (Sept. 19, 2011)
EPA Science Advisory Board Grants Deadline Extension for Comments on PCB Expert Panel (August 9, 2011)
Coalition Request to EPA for Extension of Time to Comment on Expert Panel (August 5, 2011)
AGA Comment Letter on Draft Guidance on Waters of the United States (July 29, 2011)
AGA/Coalition Comments on EPA Draft Guidance on Waters of the United States (July 29, 2011)
AGA/EPA Boiler MACT Letters re Sierra Club Petition for Reconsideration (July 2011)
AGA Comments on Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities (July 11, 2011)
AGA Questions to EPA Ozone Review Panel (March 14, 2011)
Statement of Issues filed for Subpart W Court Case AGA v. EPA (March 2, 2011)
AGA Petition for Reconsideration of Subpart W (March 2, 2011)
Presentation from AGA-OTC Webinar on Compressors (Feb. 1, 2011)
AGA-ANGA Comments on EPA Greenhouse Gas Proposal for Trucks (Jan. 31, 2011)
AGA-ANGA Comments on NHTSA Fuel Economy Standards for Trucks (Jan. 31, 2011)
AGA Petition for Subpart W Judicial Review (Jan. 28, 2011)
EPA Response to AGA Questions on Subpart W (Jan. 25, 2011)
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Government Links
Prior to 2006

 AGA Petition for Reconsideration of Subpart W (March 2, 2011) 

Due to unclear terms and requirements that were newly adopted by EPA in the final rule, AGA utility members are unable to determine with assurance how to comply with the Subpart W rule.  This lack of clarity will likely result in the submittal of conflicting and unreliable emissions data and, thereby, undermine the purposes of Subpart W.  AGA and its members did not have an opportunity to submit comments on these issues during the comment period on the proposed rule, because the new terms and requirements were not included in the proposed rule.   AGA believes these problems can be resolved if EPA allows an opportunity for AGA to provide its comments and proposed solutions to EPA.  AGA is therefore petitioning for EPA’s reconsideration of the Subpart W final rule.  The cover letter and petition are included below:

 
 

Join the Energy Conversation