Skip Navigation Links
2014
2013
2012
2011
AGA Comments on EPA's Air Emissions Standards for the Natural Gas Sector (Nov. 30, 2011)
AGA Files Comments with SEAB on Shale Gas Development
AGA Files Comments on EPA's Subpart W Proposed Technical Revisions (Oct. 24, 2011)
AGA Comments Supporting NiSource’s 50-Year Habitat Conservation Plan (Oct. 11, 2011)
AGA Comments to NAS on How to Reform the Tax Code to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions & Apended NAS Report on Full Fuel Cycle Energy Efficiency (Sept. 20, 2011)
AGA Comments on EPA Proposed Corrections to Subpart W Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule (Sept. 19, 2011)
EPA Science Advisory Board Grants Deadline Extension for Comments on PCB Expert Panel (August 9, 2011)
Coalition Request to EPA for Extension of Time to Comment on Expert Panel (August 5, 2011)
AGA Comment Letter on Draft Guidance on Waters of the United States (July 29, 2011)
AGA/Coalition Comments on EPA Draft Guidance on Waters of the United States (July 29, 2011)
AGA/EPA Boiler MACT Letters re Sierra Club Petition for Reconsideration (July 2011)
AGA Comments on Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities (July 11, 2011)
AGA Questions to EPA Ozone Review Panel (March 14, 2011)
Statement of Issues filed for Subpart W Court Case AGA v. EPA (March 2, 2011)
AGA Petition for Reconsideration of Subpart W (March 2, 2011)
Presentation from AGA-OTC Webinar on Compressors (Feb. 1, 2011)
AGA-ANGA Comments on EPA Greenhouse Gas Proposal for Trucks (Jan. 31, 2011)
AGA-ANGA Comments on NHTSA Fuel Economy Standards for Trucks (Jan. 31, 2011)
AGA Petition for Subpart W Judicial Review (Jan. 28, 2011)
EPA Response to AGA Questions on Subpart W (Jan. 25, 2011)
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Government Links
Prior to 2006

 AGA/Coalition Comments on EPA Draft Guidance on Waters of the United States (July 29, 2011) 

On July 29, 2011, AGA and the organizations listed on the cover page of these comments ("Coalition") filed comments in response to the Environmental Protection Agency's and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Draft Guidance on Identifying Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act (CWA), 76 Fed. Reg. 24,479 (May 2, 2011). Our comments set forth numerous concerns with the new 2011 Draft Guidance. As a threshold matter, unlike prior guidance documents, which were limited to the section 404 program, the Agencies intend the Draft Guidance to apply to the entire CWA. The members of the Coalition are very concerned that the Draft Guidance and its supporting economic analysis fail to explain, consider, or analyze the implications that this Draft Guidance will have on other important CWA programs, programs that are vital to the proper functioning of the CWA. We believe that applying such broad jurisdictional principles such as the aggregation of all waters in a watershed and the regulation of agricultural, irrigation, and roadside ditches to the entire CWA structure (water quality standards, total maximum daily loads (“TMDLs”), etc.) does not make sense and, at a minimum, should be thought through carefully and with the full benefit and protections of the APA (Administrative Procedure Act). Indeed, the APA was designed to address these types of expansive changes and, in particular, to provide administrative agencies with the input required to avoid unintended consequences.

 
 

Join the Energy Conversation