Skip Navigation Links
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Government Links
Prior to 2006
Joint Letter from the SPCC Industy Coalition to EPA Requesting an Extention of the SPCC Rule Compliance Dates (Oct. 6, 2005)
AGA Comments on EPA's Proposed One Year SPCC Extension (July 7, 2004)
USWAG Comments on 2004 Draft report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulation (May 20, 2004)
AGA Letter Response to EPA Data Request to Support Natural Gas Transportation Equipment & SPCC Transportation Exemption (Feb. 27, 2004)
AGA Letter to EPA Requesting Natural Gas Transportation Equipment & SPCC Transportation Exemption (Jan. 19, 2004)
AGA Letter to EPA Regarding NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activities (Nov. 19, 2003)
AGA Comments on OPS Best Management Practices for Pipeline Repairs (Sept. 29, 2003)
AGA Comments on Proposed NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Large and Small Construction Activities (Feb. 3, 2003)
AGA Comments on EPA's Proposal to Withdraw Final Water Quality Rule Published in July 2000 (Jan. 27, 2003)
AGA Comments on EPA Proposed Storm Water Standards for Large and Small Construction Projects (Dec. 23, 2002)
AGA Comments on Impact of Draft PCB Mega Rule Revisions (Sept. 5, 2002)
USWAG Letter to EPA Requesting Interpretation of PCB Storage for Reuse Rules (Feb. 20, 2001)
USWAG/AGA Comments on DOT Companion Proposed Manifest Reform Rule (Oct. 4, 2001)
USWAG/AGA Comments on EPA Proposed Manifest Reform Rule (Oct. 4, 2001)
AGA Comments on EPA's Proposed TRIC Reporting Modifications (Feb. 4, 2005)

 AGA Letter to EPA Regarding NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activities (Nov. 19, 2003) 

On November 19, 2003 AGA sent a letter to the Chief of the Industrial Branch of EPA Water Permits regarding the implementation of the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activities (CGP).  The letter details AGA's understanding that the General Permit’s requirements apply to the installation and construction of new gas pipelines and their necessary appurtenances, but not to the emergency restoration of service through the repair of existing pipelines.  AGA applauded this common sense approach and thanks EPA for clarifying an issue that had raised significant concerns for AGA members regarding their ability to perform emergency pipeline repairs and projects needed to restore service.
 

Join the Energy Conversation