Breakdown of a Residential Natural Gas Bill

As stakeholders and policymakers discuss utility costs, consumer bills, and the role of authorized utility returns, this Energy Insight breaks down the residential natural gas bill to show how many cents of every dollar paid by customers are attributable to commodity costs, delivery charges, taxes, policy riders, and surcharges, and utility returns. In every region of the country, the utility’s return on invested capital represents the smallest slice of the bill. Policy riders, surcharges, and taxes together can be comparable to the cost of the commodity itself.

For this analysis, AGA reviewed residential tariffs for the three largest natural gas utilities—excluding municipally owned utilities—in every U.S. state and the District of Columbia. The utilities included in this analysis account for 85% of U.S. residential natural gas delivery revenue. Tariffs reviewed are those in effect as of April 1, 2026, and the results are weighted by utility revenue based on 2023 residential deliveries. In jurisdictions with separate residential heating and non-heating tariffs, the analysis used the heating tariff. The findings below break the bill down by component, followed by data, methods, and additional illustrative scenarios.

Key Findings

Methods and Discussion

All data has been compiled from publicly available individual utility tariffs for residential classes and aggregated into state and regional data and weighted by the share of residential revenues. The categories collected and reported include:

Scenario Analysis

To illustrate the impact of alternative financing assumptions, AGA recalculated the estimated capital-return portion of the residential bill under three illustrative weighted-average cost of capital scenarios compared to the baseline, while holding the tariffed customer charge, distribution charge, and policy riders and surcharges constant. Commodity costs and taxes are excluded from the sensitivity analysis, as they are pass-through items that do not generate a return on investment.

The results show that residential bills are only modestly sensitive to changes in assumed capital costs because the estimated capital return is the smallest component of the total bill. The baseline scenario applies the same assumptions used to estimate the capital-return component of the bill, specifically a capital structure with 55% equity and 45% debt and a 5.0% cost of debt, paired with the national weighted-average authorized ROE of 9.77%, resulting in a weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) of 7.62%. Under the scenario with a lower ROE, a smaller share of equity, and a lower cost of debt (Scenario 3), the estimated monthly bill falls by $0.80 to $1.50 compared with the baseline. Under the scenario with greater leverage and higher costs of debt and equity (Scenario 2), monthly bills rise by $0.57 to $0.92. Even with a sharp shift toward debt financing at unchanged debt costs and higher equity costs (Scenario 1), bills only fall by $0.54 to $1.05 per month.

These scenarios are illustrative and should not be read as mechanical bill-saving estimates. In practice, capital structure, debt costs, and allowed returns are connected. If utility investment is perceived as riskier, or if utilities are pushed toward higher leverage, lenders and investors may require higher returns, which could reduce or eliminate the expected customer savings from a lower assumed WACC. Lower authorized returns could therefore raise the cost of capital or disincentivize investment in the system—with potential impacts on reliability, safety, and access—while delivering minimal, if any, realized savings on consumers’ bills.

Notes: Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is calculated as equity share × return on equity (ROE) plus debt share × cost of debt. Estimated impacts on monthly bills reflect only changes to the estimated capital-return component of the residential bill. These results are illustrative and use standardized assumptions. Actual utility capital structures, authorized ROEs, debt costs, and earned returns vary by jurisdiction and company. In practice, these inputs are not independent: if utility investment becomes riskier or capital structures become more leveraged, debt costs and required equity returns may rise, reducing or eliminating expected customer savings.

*The baseline scenario reflects the national weighted-average authorized ROE and resulting WACC. The alternative scenarios are hypothetical and therefore use assumed ROEs for illustrative comparison.

For questions, please contact Juan Alvarado | jalvarado@aga.org or Liz Pardue | lpardue@aga.org

In issuing and making this publication available, AGA is not undertaking to render professional or other services for or on behalf of any person or entity. Nor is AGA undertaking to perform any duty owed by any person or entity to someone else. Anyone using this document should rely on his or her own independent judgment or, as appropriate, seek the advice of a competent professional in determining the exercise of reasonable care in any given circumstances. The statements in this publication are for general information and represent an unaudited compilation of statistical information that could contain coding or processing errors. AGA makes no warranties, express or implied, nor representations about the accuracy of the information in the publication or its appropriateness for any given purpose or situation. This publication shall not be construed as including advice, guidance, or recommendations to take, or not to take, regarding any matter, including without limitation relating to investments or the purchase or sale of any securities, shares or other assets of any kind. Should you take any such action or decision; you do so at your own risk. Information on the topics covered by this publication may be available from other sources, which the user may wish to consult for additional views or information not covered by this publication.

Copyright © 2026 American Gas Association. All rights reserved